Thursday, August 27, 2009

GREEN ADVANTAGE How to Beat the Next Recession

ANDREW WINSTON

1:37 PM Wednesday June 24, 2009

Tags:Decision making, Green business, Recession

We're in the midst of the worst decline in auto sales history — yet Toyota can't make the newest model of its hybrid gas-electric Prius fast enough. According to the New York Times, the world's largest automaker has received 80,000 pre-orders already, one-fifth of the company's Prius sales goal for the year. On the heels of the depressing GM and Chrysler bankruptcies and layoffs, Toyota has instituted overtime production in its Tsutsumi plant in Japan.

This news comes on the heels of one of Honda's latest entries in the hybrid market, the significantly revamped Insight, becoming the bestselling car in Japan in April — not the bestselling hybrid, but the bestselling vehicle — racking up over 10,000 sales at $19,000 a pop.

The era of niche eco-vehicles is over. With Toyota and Honda experiencing their first losses in decades, the vast success of the green parts of their product portfolios must be very welcome — a life boat in troubled times.

It's educational to think for a minute about when the foundations of these successes were built. Toyota started development on the first generation of Prius, not one, but two recessions ago. Sixteen years ago, on the heels of the early 90s downturn, Toyota started designing what it thought would fit the demands of the 21st Century. Early in the process — and even though oil was only $17 per barrel — the team decided that a critical focus should be "environment." And while I can't say exactly when Honda decided to completely retool their earlier Insight model, how long after the early 2000s recession could it possibly have been?

A wide range of companies seem to be making moves now to prepare for a greener future. In addition to well-publicized mega-goals for growth of green product sales from the likes of P&G, GE, and IBM, others are signaling their intentions to play in new spaces. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (TSMC), which the New York Times calls "one of the most formidable manufacturers on the planet," has indicated, strongly, that it will try its hand in renewable energy and next-generation lighting. TSMC just reorganized at the most senior levels to do so. Here's the Times on the shift:

"The company declared its new intentions with a bold gesture. It stripped Rick Tsai of his chief executive title and placed him in charge of a new unit created to look into fresh business opportunities...In an interview ahead of the management shuffle...Mr. Tsai highlighted solar cells and LEDs as the most likely markets it would enter."

In addition to shaking up these growing industries, and possibly helping to lower the costs of both solar and LED lights, the play is a smart bet on green innovation that should help keep TSMC growing for years — perhaps paying off big time during the next tech spending downturn (which may happen sooner than a global recession).

TSMC is not the only tech company making noise about looking for growth outside of traditional spaces. Applied Materials, the guys behind the machines behind semiconductors, moved strongly into solar a few years ago — it's a bright spot for the company during this brutal drop in tech spending. And Andy Grove, legendary CEO of Intel, has suggested strongly that his alma mater should use its technological expertise to make better batteries (see the same Times article from above).

Innovation takes time. Building new markets that can grow into significant sources of revenue takes hard work and patience. So what's going to prop up your earnings the next time the world, or just your industry, goes into slow-down mode? What will your customers want and need 10 years from now? One core way to answer that question is to think hard about coming environmental pressures and trends.

Mega-regulation on carbon will raise the cost of carbon-intensive value chains. Water shortages could severely restrict growth in key regions or in specific product markets. Rising concerns about chemicals and toxicity will radically shift demand for some products (think about what's happened in just a few years to the baby bottles, toys, and other plastics that include phthalates or the chemical "BPA").

Think through these large trends, ask heretical questions (such as, "What if we used no water?"), and use the green lens to spot long-term trends. This process should start your innovation wheels turning. While we climb out of this downturn — and green strategy can play a critical role in helping companies do that — it's good to start thinking longer term. Believe it or not, it's time to get ready for the next slowdown now.

 

Posted via web from dwimuhtaman's posterous

Leadership is determined by Context

BY FC EXPERT BLOGGER NORMAN WOLFETue Aug 25, 2009 at 1:19 AM

This blog is written by a member of our expert blogging community and expresses that expert's views alone.

My dear friend Paul Walker just posted and interesting blog on his Huffington Post site.  In it he proposes that the first thing he would do if the USA was his client is “do is a teambuilding to improve honest communication and trust.”  And then goes on to say that “If we do not stop fighting each other, we will fall behind as a nation-state, just like companies whose leadership fights each other.”

Paul is a CEO Coach and works wonders with his business clients to align the teams to implement their business strategies.  And in business conflict among team members is the surest way to impeded success.

The problem with associating the success parameters from business to politics is that they are not the same "game", anymore than one can play rugby by the rules of baseball.

Our government was set up to achieve certain ends; it was designed primarily for control of power. Our three divisions, executive, legislative and judiciary were purposely designed to ensure no one function could gain complete control of our nation. Checks and Balances was the designing objective. 

And as for organizations who “explore ideas to find the best way instead of playing win/lose games” I have to remind you that our whole society is based on the adversarial principle (a win/lose game).  Our founding fathers recognized that we were unlikely to find A Solomon the Wise to discern the truth or the best solution so they set up our system based on the idea that the truth can best be is discovered by opposing views being voiced and through the "jury of one's peers" truth would emerge.  This is the basis of our legal system and it is also the foundation of our Two Party System. It was once said that the political extremes define the issues and the moderates pass the laws.  We need a return of the moderates to act as “jury of one’s peers.”  

The problem we have is not one of team building but organization design. We designed it to have opposing positions compete with the belief that the best solution would emerge from the conflict.  We could of course redesign our system and create one that relied on the same principles of business.  However business is governed as much by market forces as they are by leadership team dynamics. 

Government was never designed to run efficiently, it was designed to control misuse of power and given that we are dealing with humans playing with immense powers, I am not sure I want to change the design. 

I coach organizations and the CEOs who lead them. Organizations are living entities and have their own Soulful Purpose. When coaching the Organization my goal is to help it realize its unique contribution to our world. When coaching business leaders I am working within a certain Context, a certain set of objectives and governing rules.  To coach political leaders as if they were business CEOs would be like coaching an artist as if she was a football player - different Context, different objective, different game.

Posted via web from dwimuhtaman's posterous

Leadership is determined by Context

BY FC EXPERT BLOGGER NORMAN WOLFETue Aug 25, 2009 at 1:19 AM

This blog is written by a member of our expert blogging community and expresses that expert's views alone.

My dear friend Paul Walker just posted and interesting blog on his Huffington Post site.  In it he proposes that the first thing he would do if the USA was his client is “do is a teambuilding to improve honest communication and trust.”  And then goes on to say that “If we do not stop fighting each other, we will fall behind as a nation-state, just like companies whose leadership fights each other.”

Paul is a CEO Coach and works wonders with his business clients to align the teams to implement their business strategies.  And in business conflict among team members is the surest way to impeded success.

The problem with associating the success parameters from business to politics is that they are not the same "game", anymore than one can play rugby by the rules of baseball.

Our government was set up to achieve certain ends; it was designed primarily for control of power. Our three divisions, executive, legislative and judiciary were purposely designed to ensure no one function could gain complete control of our nation. Checks and Balances was the designing objective. 

And as for organizations who “explore ideas to find the best way instead of playing win/lose games” I have to remind you that our whole society is based on the adversarial principle (a win/lose game).  Our founding fathers recognized that we were unlikely to find A Solomon the Wise to discern the truth or the best solution so they set up our system based on the idea that the truth can best be is discovered by opposing views being voiced and through the "jury of one's peers" truth would emerge.  This is the basis of our legal system and it is also the foundation of our Two Party System. It was once said that the political extremes define the issues and the moderates pass the laws.  We need a return of the moderates to act as “jury of one’s peers.”  

The problem we have is not one of team building but organization design. We designed it to have opposing positions compete with the belief that the best solution would emerge from the conflict.  We could of course redesign our system and create one that relied on the same principles of business.  However business is governed as much by market forces as they are by leadership team dynamics. 

Government was never designed to run efficiently, it was designed to control misuse of power and given that we are dealing with humans playing with immense powers, I am not sure I want to change the design. 

I coach organizations and the CEOs who lead them. Organizations are living entities and have their own Soulful Purpose. When coaching the Organization my goal is to help it realize its unique contribution to our world. When coaching business leaders I am working within a certain Context, a certain set of objectives and governing rules.  To coach political leaders as if they were business CEOs would be like coaching an artist as if she was a football player - different Context, different objective, different game.

Posted via web from dwimuhtaman's posterous

Sunday, August 23, 2009

Surat dari Sahabat (2)

Ia mencintai buku dan menulis apa saja dari pikiran seberang.

Suratnya selalu bergelora mengikuti deras kali dari taman hidup

Dan ia melanjutkan:

 

Lalu kau tiba-tiba terbangun.  Menjadi kanak-kanak lagi. 

Mengisi hayal yang tertiup angin

Mencoba bertahan, merebutnya

Lalu terduduk di tanah yang sama

Pergi membasuh muka

Menyegarkan luka yang tercabik segala dusta

Terhuyung.  Bangun lagi ke dunianya sendiri

apel yang dipetiknya.  Dunia yang berbaris, melingkar, terputus, penuh arsir

: mengekang, katanya.

 

Tak kuasa menolak.  Ia masih bersyukur

Tidak tercampak.  Tertendang dan mengucur tangis sesal diri. 

Luka adalah waktu yang membeku.  Tidaklah sakit benar mengaduh. 

Hanya giliran yang harus dilewati. 

menjemput diri sendiri dari serakan debu-debu

Ia tetap sebuah matahari.  Dan kini menepi.  Menemui panggilan sunyi dan menimbang panen dari sebidang jalan yang telah dilalui

Dipandangi selalu langit-langit kamar sewaannya.  Asing menyelinap dari lorong buta

Ia telah pergi sendiri ke kamar itu

 

Meninggalkan semua yang dimilikinya—sesuatu yang membantu subur dirinya, sesubur kumisnya, membentang bagai laut hitam dari samudra baru

Mengingat itu, mengingat haru: kasih ibunya yang terhampar dalam lautan ungu

; bapak yang selalu ingat lonceng berbunyi di sekolah, tekun menunggu kuning padi sepanjang waktu

; adik-adiknya yang lucu dan tumbuh bahu demi bahu, dan kakaknya mengembara pada jalan batu

; pohon-pohon mangga dan angin-angin yang berseru

; dan udara pada musim yang berdebu

; teman laki-lakinya yang kocak, jenaka akrab—menjengkelkannya selalu

 

Ia tidaklah kolokan sekarang

kalau hanya merindukan jejak yang tidaklah kabur

hanya mengurai betapa manisnya sisi di belakang punggungnya

 

Ia kadang bimbang

pada dirinya sendiri

merasa asing

dan mencoba melupakan

menjelma seperti A, B, C dan sederet kata-kata semu

dia mulai banyak menimbang

ragu memantul-mantul ke dalam

 

Padahal betapa semua kawan mencintai

Apa adanya.  Langit yang terbuka

Posted via email from dwimuhtaman's posterous

Thursday, October 30, 2008

Dari Balik Rerumputan

Tiba-tiba adalah kejauhan
Mataku terlempar pada semua hamparan
Bukit, padang ilalang
Langit
Udara dingin pegunungan

Meliak liuk peta sebuah jalan
Dihadang bukit yang tak berkesudahan
Satu dua rumah di ujung bukit
Membentang kampung halaman yang panjang
Dan kisah yang tak terbayangkan

…..


Goroka, PNG, 23 July 2006
Nyanyian gelombang bukit membentur sunyi

Seperti ombak
Bergelombang bergulung gulung
Perahu seperti tenggelam dibalik buih buih
Juga sebutir papua new guinea
Hitam dan hilang dalam gelombang
Bukit-bukit membentuk lautan
Pada ujung
Pada sebaliknya
Nyanyian sunyi yang sembunyi
Gemuruh yang sepi
Gelisah yang menanti

Di ujung bukit yang nampak telanjang
Dengan susah payah mereka berkemas
Menampakkan rapi seperti yang dijajakan
Dimana-mana
Tetapi di sini, di balik lautan bukit ini
Segalanya berbeda
Atap pit pit, dinding anyaman bambu
Melingkap meningkap menyungkup
Membatasi dunia

Kau termangu
Di bawah matahari di ujung pintu
Dan malam yang merayap dari semua rerumputan
Dimanakah rumahku?

Sepi seperti dulu
Orang-orang berebut keramaian
Aku tak mampu berpaling dan menutup pintu
Tetapi dari balik rerumputan
Diantara lautan bukit dan buih buih
Tempatku kini tak mau pergi
Membentur sunyi



Goroka, PNG, 23 July 2006